[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GUB
From: |
Neil Puttock |
Subject: |
Re: GUB |
Date: |
Sat, 8 Oct 2011 17:47:25 +0100 |
On 8 October 2011 17:41, Graham Percival <address@hidden> wrote:
> Yeah, that's the point of using one of the other commands; you can
> specify the branch. There's also some way of specifying the
> branch using the bin/gub method too... it'd be listed in
> lilypond.make... but I don't have it written down handy.
Heh, I couldn't work out any command which would do the same, so just
hacked it instead. :)
> It might be nice to determine the "recommended" command to build
> the installer for a specific binary and a specific platform -- and
> to easily support giving it a local repository -- but I'm not
> offering to do that. Maybe since Phil is new to GUB, he'll be
> energetic about fixing and documenting usage and bugs for the next
> couple of weeks until gets jaded like us. :)
Haha, can't we just kidnap Jan and get him to tell us? :)
Cheers,
Neil
- Re: Optimizes note-heads.cc and introduces robust_symbol2string. (issue5233042), (continued)
- Re: Optimizes note-heads.cc and introduces robust_symbol2string. (issue5233042), Phil Holmes, 2011/10/07
- Re: Optimizes note-heads.cc and introduces robust_symbol2string. (issue5233042), Graham Percival, 2011/10/07
- Re: Optimizes note-heads.cc and introduces robust_symbol2string. (issue5233042), Carl Sorensen, 2011/10/07
- Re: Optimizes note-heads.cc and introduces robust_symbol2string. (issue5233042), Phil Holmes, 2011/10/07
- GUB, Graham Percival, 2011/10/07
- Re: GUB, Phil Holmes, 2011/10/08
- Re: GUB, Graham Percival, 2011/10/08
- Re: GUB, Phil Holmes, 2011/10/08
- Re: GUB, Neil Puttock, 2011/10/08
- Re: GUB, Graham Percival, 2011/10/08
- Re: GUB,
Neil Puttock <=
- Re: GUB, Graham Percival, 2011/10/08
- Re: GUB, Phil Holmes, 2011/10/08
- Re: GUB, Graham Percival, 2011/10/08
- Re: GUB, Phil Holmes, 2011/10/09
- Re: GUB, Phil Holmes, 2011/10/09
- Re: GUB, Graham Percival, 2011/10/09
- Re: GUB, Phil Holmes, 2011/10/09
- Re: GUB, Graham Percival, 2011/10/09
- Re: GUB, Phil Holmes, 2011/10/09
- Re: GUB, Graham Percival, 2011/10/09