[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Cyrillic texinfo support
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: Cyrillic texinfo support |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Aug 2012 19:56:54 +0200 (CEST) |
> I don't have more than the power of appeal to ask people from
> refraining sabotaging the development branch until the settling
> phase of 2.16 is mostly over, and that will be the case when 2.16.0
> and 2.17.0 have been released: everything that "actually should" be
> in 2.16.0 but did not warrant _further_ delaying 2.16.0 will end up
> in 2.17.0. If we put wild changes in 2.17.0 already, this will
> significantly delay 2.16.1 with followup changes (or testing
> exposure of its tentative contents) and will consequently affect the
> perceived quality of 2.16.
Hmm, `wild changes' is a mild exaggeration, isn't it? It makes
50 Cyrillic characters appear in the PDFs which were simply missing
previously. It's a one-line change in `macros.itexi' and a new file.
And of course I've run `make doc' on a freshly cloned git repository
and checked the output whether everything is fine.
Anyway, I now understand that we essentially have a code freeze in
`staging' until 2.16 is out. Somehow I got a wrong impression about
that, sorry.
Werner
- Cyrillic texinfo support, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/08/04
- Re: Cyrillic texinfo support, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/08/13
- Re: Cyrillic texinfo support, David Kastrup, 2012/08/13
- Re: Cyrillic texinfo support, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/08/13
- Re: Cyrillic texinfo support, David Kastrup, 2012/08/13
- Re: Cyrillic texinfo support,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: Cyrillic texinfo support, David Kastrup, 2012/08/13
- Re: Cyrillic texinfo support, Graham Percival, 2012/08/13
- Re: Cyrillic texinfo support, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/08/13
- Re: Cyrillic texinfo support, David Kastrup, 2012/08/13
- Re: Cyrillic texinfo support, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/08/13
- Re: Cyrillic texinfo support, Graham Percival, 2012/08/13
- Re: Cyrillic texinfo support, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/08/13