[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Cyrillic texinfo support
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: Cyrillic texinfo support |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Aug 2012 21:25:25 +0200 (CEST) |
> Pushing to staging means "I consider this change to be safe and
> can't imagine anybody suggesting anything to change".
Actually, this is what I still believe. However, we probably agree to
disagree, and going the Rietveld route is certainly the safe way.
> For changes with potentially large impact, I use a review even when
> I am of the opinion that I am by far the best-suited programmer for
> dealing with a particular problem.
What exactly do you consider a `large impact'? A large number of
files involved? Larger visible changes?
> It is a change with large effects which is part of the reason Werner
> considers it desirable.
Compared to the size of the documentation, its less than a tiny
effect: As mentioned earlier, less then 50 Cyrillic *characters*
previously mssing will appear in a few code snippets.
Werner
- Cyrillic texinfo support, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/08/04
- Re: Cyrillic texinfo support, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/08/13
- Re: Cyrillic texinfo support, David Kastrup, 2012/08/13
- Re: Cyrillic texinfo support, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/08/13
- Re: Cyrillic texinfo support, David Kastrup, 2012/08/13
- Re: Cyrillic texinfo support, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/08/13
- Re: Cyrillic texinfo support, David Kastrup, 2012/08/13
- Re: Cyrillic texinfo support, Graham Percival, 2012/08/13
- Re: Cyrillic texinfo support, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/08/13
- Re: Cyrillic texinfo support, David Kastrup, 2012/08/13
- Re: Cyrillic texinfo support,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: Cyrillic texinfo support, Graham Percival, 2012/08/13
- Re: Cyrillic texinfo support, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/08/13