[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Be serious about setstrokeadjust in PostScript primitives (issue 866
From: |
k-ohara5a5a |
Subject: |
Re: Be serious about setstrokeadjust in PostScript primitives (issue 8663044) |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Apr 2013 21:56:07 +0000 |
Confirming that the .pdf size doubles, but only if we measure relative
to the size of the smaller .pdfs we get if we know to use
-dno-point-and-click. The time required to process the larger .ps was
less that 1% the total time to compile my test .ly files.
Confirming that the resulting larger .pdf has better and more consistent
line thickness when previewed with Adobe Reader on WinXP.
I had to look for a while to find a PDF previewer that showed the
original problem. Maybe no-pretty-previews by default?
The Evince shipped with Gnome as DocumentViewer 2.32.0
using poppler/cairo (0.14.4) shows no problem (good previews with
visually consistent line thicknesses at all zoom). SumatraPDF, using
the MuPDF engine, shows no problem. AcroRead on WinXP shows a minor
problem, that only becomes obvious I we turn on the setting "Enhance
Thin Lines". (I just did a fresh install of Adobe Reader XI and found
"EnhanceThinLines" is set by default.)
Once I found the problem, this patch did fix it.
https://codereview.appspot.com/8663044/
- Be serious about setstrokeadjust in PostScript primitives (issue 8663044), janek . lilypond, 2013/04/12
- Re: Be serious about setstrokeadjust in PostScript primitives (issue 8663044), janek . lilypond, 2013/04/14
- Re: Be serious about setstrokeadjust in PostScript primitives (issue 8663044), dak, 2013/04/14
- Re: Be serious about setstrokeadjust in PostScript primitives (issue 8663044), dak, 2013/04/14
- Re: Be serious about setstrokeadjust in PostScript primitives (issue 8663044),
k-ohara5a5a <=
- Re: Be serious about setstrokeadjust in PostScript primitives (issue 8663044), dak, 2013/04/23
- Re: Be serious about setstrokeadjust in PostScript primitives (issue 8663044), k-ohara5a5a, 2013/04/24
- Re: Be serious about setstrokeadjust in PostScript primitives (issue 8663044), dak, 2013/04/25
- Re: Be serious about setstrokeadjust in PostScript primitives (issue 8663044), dak, 2013/04/25