[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Sep 2013 15:43:38 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Joseph Rushton Wakeling <address@hidden> writes:
> On 24/09/13 14:14, Graham Percival wrote:
>> Umm, the whole point of the VM is to ensure that the contributor's
>> setup is *right*.
>
> As far as I can see, the whole point of the VM is to get round the
> fact that the range of environments you can use to hack on Lilypond is
> severely restricted.
>
> I'm suggesting to you that this restriction is in itself a problem.
Get back when you have a working prototype. Builds character.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub, (continued)
- Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub, Graham Percival, 2013/09/24
- Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub, Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2013/09/24
- Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub, Phil Holmes, 2013/09/24
- Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub, Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2013/09/24
- Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub, David Kastrup, 2013/09/24
- Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub, Phil Holmes, 2013/09/24
- Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub, Graham Percival, 2013/09/22
- Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub, Urs Liska, 2013/09/23
- Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub, David Kastrup, 2013/09/23
- Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub, Janek Warchoł, 2013/09/23
- Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub, Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2013/09/24
- Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub, Janek Warchoł, 2013/09/16
- Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub, David Kastrup, 2013/09/16