[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Sep 2013 20:14:11 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 01:12:21PM +0200, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
> (1) If you need to install a VM or a custom distro flavour to hack
> on a project, your design setup is very likely to be wrong.
Umm, the whole point of the VM is to ensure that the contributor's
setup is *right*.
> If you really, really need contributors to use certain custom
> packages, you're almost certainly better off making custom
> package repos for the minimal set of dependencies.
That's way more fragile than having them use a VM.
> (2) If your developers are working on maintaining a custom distro
> flavour, that's a maintenance burden that is very likely a
> distraction from useful work.
They're not actively working on it. I think it gets updated about
once a year?
> (3) If your developers all converge around a particular install
> setup, then you are missing out on important usability information
> from other platforms,
GUB is different than compiling software.
> (5) In the specific case of git-cl, my own experience was that it
> was an absolute pain. Multiple (custom) commands to be typed;
err, the whole point of the VM is that we provided a GUI to take
care of patch submission.
> Compare that with GitHub: push patches to my own repo. Click on
> "Submit pull request." Type a brief description and click a button
> ... done.
and then somebody else needs to check if it compiles or not.
- Graham
- Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub, (continued)
- Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub, Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2013/09/24
- Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub, David Kastrup, 2013/09/24
- Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub, Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2013/09/24
- Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub, David Kastrup, 2013/09/24
- Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub, Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2013/09/24
- Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub, David Kastrup, 2013/09/24
- Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub, Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2013/09/24
- Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/09/24
- Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub, David Kastrup, 2013/09/24
- Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2013/09/25
- Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub, Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2013/09/24
- Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub, Phil Holmes, 2013/09/24
- Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub, Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2013/09/24
- Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub, David Kastrup, 2013/09/24
- Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub, Phil Holmes, 2013/09/24
- Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub, David Kastrup, 2013/09/24
- Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub, Graham Percival, 2013/09/22
- Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub, Urs Liska, 2013/09/23
- Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub, David Kastrup, 2013/09/23
- Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub, Janek WarchoĊ, 2013/09/23