[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Issues list status
|
From: |
David Kastrup |
|
Subject: |
Re: Issues list status |
|
Date: |
Tue, 15 Sep 2015 19:19:25 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Colin Campbell <address@hidden> writes:
> On 2015-09-15 08:36 AM, Phil Holmes wrote:
>>
>> Don't really like the idea of an undefined status. If we don't go
>> for "invalid", perhaps another "closed" status of "abandoned" would
>> be better.
>>
>> --
>> Phil Holmes
>>
>
> Abandoned patches are a bit different from closed issues, IMO. It's
> absolutely necessary to keep the list of Open issues to a reasonably
> manageable size, so making Abandoned equivalent to closed seems
> wise.
No. An issue is not resolved by an abandoned patch.
--
David Kastrup