[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Issues list status
From: |
James Lowe |
Subject: |
Re: Issues list status |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Sep 2015 08:37:28 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 |
On 15/09/15 15:27, James wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On 15/09/15 13:57, Phil Holmes wrote:
>> A comment and a question about the status field of the issues list.
>>
>> Comment: with Google code, the status was automatically set to "Accepted"
>> for issues manually entered by a registered user. I see no reason for not
>> continuing this policy, but it does mean that bug squad members (and
>> anyone else entering issues) needs to remember to set the status manually.
>>
>> Question: there's a number of patches from _ages_ ago
>> labelled "needs_work". I believe we should change them to "abandoned",
> Actually - after reading the CG for how patches are handled (I am
> currently updating the CG here), it is the Patch Meister's
> responsibility every 6 months or so to list all patches that are
> needs-work to see if they should be changed to abandoned and preferably
> by the dev who had the patch.
>
> So i will try to do that on the next countdown.
Sorry I didn't have time to get to the 'patch abandoned' issues for this
countdown.
As the weekend is coming up, I'll have more time then and will get
something together- probably for Saturday (19th).
James