Re: lilypond-user Digest, Vol 65, Issue 34

[Till Rettig]

Trevor Daniels schrieb:
> OK, draft 8 will say:
>
>   .6 Editorial markings
>     .1 Annotational accidentals (was Musica ficta accidentals)
>        (2.8.4)
>     .2 Ligature brackets (was Ligatures)
>        (2.8.2.4)
>     .3 Baroque rhythmic notation (new)
Karl:

We don't have lilypond examples of this. I have seen this in a Novello
score for Purcells Dido. So I suggest we drop this for the moment.
(Though an ossia section might show what the editor want.)


We actually do have some in the list somewhere, I remember (was it 
Nicolas) somthing about using empty note heads for quarter notes or 
something like that -- that's what I am referring to.

I would still put the ligature brackets here, as they are an issue of 
modern editions and not of ancient notation.

And about slurs and the like: they are not specific to ancient notation, 
so they are covered somewhere else in the NR.

Actually Graham has pronounced that we should not have a task-orientated 
structure, but just tell about the issues not referring to the context 
they are used to. But maybe it is still ok in this case.

Till
>