Re: nopc -- Proposed Predefines

[Graham Percival]

On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 23:39:31 +0200
Reinhold Kainhofer <address@hidden> wrote:

> Am Montag, 14. Juli 2008 schrieb Graham Percival:
> > On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 14:25:09 +0000 (UTC)
> >
> > Given this difference, I'm not convinced that this predef is
> > really needed.  Looking at the docs and finding
> >       #(point-and-click #f)
> > (or whatever the command is) 
> 
> Hehe, yeah, that's exactly the point: It's much harder remenbering
>   #(ly:set-option 'point-and-click #f)
> than \pointAndClickOff.

You have a point there, although I found Valentin's argument about
style sheets more convincing.  I'm not objecting to adding this as
a predef; I just wanted a few more reasons.

> > isn't a huge deal, and it *is* more 
> > of a command-line argument thing.  Non-command-line people should
> > be using jedit anyway, 
> 
> Why do you want to force everyone to use jedit? I'm using kate and
> I'm more than happy.

I don't want to force everybody to use jedit; I use vim and I'm
more than happy.  However, we're both advanced users.

I've never actually used jedit myself, but I'm quite impressed
with the screenshots and video showing off the advanced commands
(auto-completion, docs, etc).   I think that most people *would*
be better served by using lilypondtool.

Cheers,
- Graham