lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Polymetric music and page breaks


From: Phil Holmes
Subject: Re: Polymetric music and page breaks
Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 09:49:27 +0100

----- Original Message ----- From: "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden>
To: "Andrea La Rose" <address@hidden>; <address@hidden>
Sent: Monday, May 30, 2011 9:11 AM
Subject: Re: Polymetric music and page breaks


----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrea La Rose" <address@hidden>
To: <address@hidden>
Sent: Monday, May 30, 2011 6:08 AM
Subject: Polymetric music and page breaks



Dear Collective Wisdom,

I posted here about a year ago about my piece. You were all very helpful and
I hope you can help me once again. Yes, it's the same pesky piece.

I've entered all the parts and need to finish editing it. I can't seem to
get it to paginate properly. I've tried inserting \bar "" judiciously and
\break judiciously, but to no avail. Attached is a minimal example, which is
still rather large, due to having eight parts. This example does not have
any \bar "" or \break commands.

Any help is appreciated!

cheers,
Andrea
http://old.nabble.com/file/p31728865/putrefaction_test.ly
putrefaction_test.ly

It looks to me that your problem stems from the way you are changing time signatures independently in each staff. By default, Lilypond expects timing to be consistent across a score. I'd suggest reading http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond/Displaying-rhythms#Polymetric-notation to see if you can change this to your satisfaction.

Apologies - I'd not read the top of your score to see that you have done this. From printing a couple of the pieces of the score individually, it looks to me that they are actually different lengths, and I know Lily can be confused by this. Viola 4 seems to me to have 17.5 complete (semi-breve) measures, whereas I think viola 3 has only got 16.8125. I may be wrong about the exact numbers, but I think this is something worth checking carefully.


--
Phil Holmes





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]