Re: Changing voice order...

[David Kastrup]

Flaming Hakama by Elaine <address@hidden> writes:

> On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 2:35 PM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> Flaming Hakama by Elaine <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>> > I'm not sure if this is a language problem, or an attitude problem.
>> > Because it seems like you are coming to the opposite interpretation of
>> what
>> > I say, despite me being very detailed in my explanation.
>> >
>> >
>> > Let's start with the main point:
>> >
>> > THE VERTICAL ORDER OF NOTES ON THE PAGE HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE ORDER
>> OF
>> > THE VOICES WITHIN THE << // // // >> CONSTRUCT, OR WHAT THE VOICE NAMES
>> ARE
>> > CALLED
>> >
>> > Do you agree with that?  You should, since it is true.
>>
>> No, I don't agree with it.
>
>
> Then you are being obstinate.
>
> A statement of fact, and you don't agree with it.

It's _only_ statements of fact that one can sensibly agree or disagree
with, so that's not particularly egregious.

> What are we to do with such childish behavior?
>
>
>
>> If you cannot distinguish "high correlation
>> though not 100%" from "no correlation", I don't see a point in
>> continuing.

There you have your answer to "what to do with such childish behavior".

-- 
David Kastrup