Re: [Mldonkey-users] Re: pango-20021128b

[Taros666]

Roland Arendes schrieb:
> Hi
>
>
> > Can anyone tell me, how everyone seems to think 2.00+2 is out?
>
>
> http://savannah.nongnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/mldonkey/mldonkey/config/configure?rev=1.29&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup
>
> CURRENT_VERSION=2.00+2
>
> Yes, the version numbering *is* fucked up. When mldonkey is back
> and applied pango's patches, we should switch to at least 2.1.

Time for big UUUUPS...I didn't look in the sources and wasn't able to 
type "version" in the commandline...
I just looked in the CVS-branching-Tags...So the version-numbering is 
really fucked up...either in CVS or in Source ;)

Taros666