Re: [Mldonkey-users] Re: pango-20021128b

[Taros666]

Sven Hartge schrieb:
> How about increasing the version to 2.5 or even 3.0?
I think noone should mess around with the Version numbering; it is 
already *ucked up.
If you look in the CVS you see, that there are NO sources for any 2.00+2 
Version. But everyone is refering to 2.00+2, when they talk about
2.00+1 fix1 (or am I blind and can't use CVS anymore?)

I think it is fine, the way pango handle the version numbering with the 
date of release and a,b,c...

Can anyone tell me, how everyone seems to think 2.00+2 is out?

Taros666