[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Mldonkey-users] Sha1 implementation benchmark
From: |
Fortin Denis |
Subject: |
Re: [Mldonkey-users] Sha1 implementation benchmark |
Date: |
Wed, 04 Feb 2004 23:12:15 +0100 |
Le mer 04/02/2004 à 22:32, kami petersen a écrit :
> Fortin Denis wrote:
>
> >Le mer 04/02/2004 à 20:40, kami petersen a écrit :
> >
> >
> >>Fortin Denis wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>I've added another implementation of sha1 hash. It's
> >>>written by Brian Gladman and can be found here :
> >>>http://fp.gladman.plus.com/cryptography_technology/sha/index.htm
> >>>
> >>>Before everything else i would like to make sure that the licence is ok
> >>>for mldonkey.
> >>>
> >>it sounds like a bsd-style license, and as such it should be 100%
> >>compatible with the gpl, even without the extra notice he's included.
> >>for compatibility see the page on licenses on http://www.gnu.org/
> >>
> >>if you choose to add the gpl to it, then copyleft of this particular
> >>code and changes to it is enforced.
> >>
> >>/kami
> >>
> >>
> >The 'problem' for me is this :
> >In my understanding the GPL allow me to modify all things in the file
> >except the gpl itself, including the notice. So under the gpl i should
> >be to remove the author's notice.
> >But i'm allowed to use this file under GPL if and only if keep this
> >notice.
> >
> >Denis Fortin
> >
> >
> >
> the gpl can not allow you to edit the authors' licence.
>
> the author's licence has to be retained, but you can add the gpl to it
> as well. this is no problem.
>
> the author's licence does not limit the gpl in any way.
>
> the note in the author's licence that you may combine it with the gpl is
> unnecessary, you could do it anyway, unless had it contained demands
> that were in conflict with the gpl.
>
> by merging this code with mldonkey you will be combining the two
> licenses, but the author's license does not, of course, affect any other
> mldonkey code that is not derived from the author's work, and should not
> be added to other code.
>
> so... what you should do is:
>
> 1 insert the normal heading from the mldonkey files:
>
> (*
> This file is part of mldonkey.
>
> mldonkey is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
> (at your option) any later version.
>
> mldonkey is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> GNU General Public License for more details.
>
> You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> along with mldonkey; if not, write to the Free Software
> Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA
> *)
>
> 2 keep the original copyright notice, and licence. don't mess with it.
> don't add your own copyright, you can do this only on things that you
> write yourself from scratch.
>
> 3 submit it to the repository.
>
> there is no problem. i think =)
>
> /kami
Thanks for this explanation.
I will submit a proper patch with this heading, if the test is
conclusive.
Denis Fortin
- [Mldonkey-users] Sha1 implementation benchmark, Fortin Denis, 2004/02/04
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] Sha1 implementation benchmark, kami petersen, 2004/02/04
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] Sha1 implementation benchmark, Fortin Denis, 2004/02/04
- [Mldonkey-users] Bug in Overnet source handling causes being banned, mldonkey, 2004/02/06
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] Bug in Overnet source handling causes being banned, Pierre Etchemaite, 2004/02/06
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] Bug in Overnet source handling causes being banned, mldonkey, 2004/02/06
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] Bug in Overnet source handling causes being banned, Pierre Etchemaite, 2004/02/06
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] Bug in Overnet source handling causes being banned, mldonkey, 2004/02/07
[Mldonkey-users] Re: Sha1 implementation benchmark, spiralvoice, 2004/02/04