[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Mldonkey-users] Bug in Overnet source handling causes being banned
From: |
Pierre Etchemaite |
Subject: |
Re: [Mldonkey-users] Bug in Overnet source handling causes being banned |
Date: |
Fri, 6 Feb 2004 18:22:58 +0100 |
Le Fri, 06 Feb 2004 13:44:20 +0100, address@hidden a écrit :
> I believe that a solution would be to check if a client with the same
> IP/Port and the same client hash already exists in either edonkey OR
> overnet sources before adding a new source. (Just checking the IP is not
> enough, because it is possible that more than one client run on the same
> machine with a different port & client hash.)
MLdonkey doesn't use the same hash for eDonkey and Overnet, so it won't
work.
client hash on eDonkey is just a peer identifier, with some bytes (6th and
14th or something) used as magic values to enable eMule features.
client hash on Overnet is a peer identifier too, but it's also used to
"locate" the peer in the xor-distance space, and used to determine what keys
will be stored on the local database of that peer.
Since each have their own semantics, it may not be a very good idea to use
the same value for both (eMule magic bytes would restrict peers to some
hyperplane. Not fatal, but not clean either).
- [Mldonkey-users] Sha1 implementation benchmark, Fortin Denis, 2004/02/04
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] Sha1 implementation benchmark, kami petersen, 2004/02/04
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] Sha1 implementation benchmark, Fortin Denis, 2004/02/04
- [Mldonkey-users] Bug in Overnet source handling causes being banned, mldonkey, 2004/02/06
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] Bug in Overnet source handling causes being banned,
Pierre Etchemaite <=
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] Bug in Overnet source handling causes being banned, mldonkey, 2004/02/06
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] Bug in Overnet source handling causes being banned, Pierre Etchemaite, 2004/02/06
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] Bug in Overnet source handling causes being banned, mldonkey, 2004/02/07
[Mldonkey-users] Re: Sha1 implementation benchmark, spiralvoice, 2004/02/04
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] Re: Sha1 implementation benchmark, Fortin Denis, 2004/02/04
- [Mldonkey-users] Re: Re: Sha1 implementation benchmark, spiralvoice, 2004/02/04
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] Re: Re: Sha1 implementation benchmark, b8_bavard, 2004/02/05
- [Mldonkey-users] Re: Re: Re: Sha1 implementation benchmark, spiralvoice, 2004/02/05
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] Re: Re: Re: Sha1 implementation benchmark, Fortin Denis, 2004/02/05
- [Mldonkey-users] [PATCH] new Sha1 implementation, Fortin Denis, 2004/02/07