[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: nvm.stripped versus botan
From: |
Zack Weinberg |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: nvm.stripped versus botan |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:12:59 -0800 |
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 8:29 PM, Lapo Luchini <address@hidden> wrote:
> Zack Weinberg wrote:
>> Ok, please try again with the change I just pushed
>> (ef6b444ed286c55788bc258b1dda83d5da695ea2).
>
> % fgrep _PLATFORM config.status
> S["WIN32_PLATFORM_FALSE"]=""
> S["WIN32_PLATFORM_TRUE"]="#"
>
> Yep, it compiles.
Oh good.
>> Also, what version of autoconf are you using? I get something much
>> harder to read when I do that grep.
>
> Oh, the one by default in Cygwin... either 2.13 or 2.63, AFAIK it's
> chosen automatically by a wrapper depending on values in configure.ac
> (so, in our case it should be 2.63).
Ah, I have 2.61. I guess they figured out a less horrible way to do that.
zw
- Re: [Monotone-devel] nvm.stripped versus botan, (continued)
[Monotone-devel] Re: nvm.stripped versus botan, Zack Weinberg, 2009/01/23
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: nvm.stripped versus botan, Stephen Leake, 2009/01/24
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: nvm.stripped versus botan, Markus Wanner, 2009/01/25
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: nvm.stripped versus botan, Zack Weinberg, 2009/01/25
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: nvm.stripped versus botan, Markus Wanner, 2009/01/26
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: nvm.stripped versus botan, Markus Wanner, 2009/01/31
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: nvm.stripped versus botan, Zack Weinberg, 2009/01/31
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: nvm.stripped versus botan, Markus Wanner, 2009/01/31
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: nvm.stripped versus botan, Zack Weinberg, 2009/01/31