monotone-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: nvm.stripped versus botan


From: Markus Wanner
Subject: Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: nvm.stripped versus botan
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 20:32:22 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090103)

Hi,

Zack Weinberg wrote:
>> As we now expect nvm.stripped to compile and run on most of the
>> supported systems, I think we should land nvm.stripped in about a week,
>> given further testing succeeds.
> 
> I have no objection to this plan, provided no horrible breakage turns
> up in the next few days.

I just wanted to test nvm.stripped on some OSes again, but unfortunately
I can't even get automake to run through. automake-1.9 (from my debian
sid development machine) just aborts without any I can identify as an
error message.

Running it with "-W -v" spits out (trailing lines only):

> automake-1.9: # and 'distcheck' gets cranky if we don't.  So basically what 
> this
> automake-1.9: # line does is tell 'distcheck' to shut up and ignore those two 
> files.
> automake-1.9: 
> automake-1.9:       value: find . -type f -a ! -name package_revision.txt -a 
> ! -name package_full_revision_dist.txt
> automake-1.9:       owner: Makefile
> automake-1.9:     }
> automake-1.9:   }
> automake-1.9: with `TRUE' => `find . -type f -print'
> automake-1.9: reading /usr/share/automake-1.9/am/footer.am
> automake-1.9: reading /usr/share/automake-1.9/am/install.am
> automake-1.9: reading /usr/share/automake-1.9/am/clean.am
> automake-1.9: not writing ./Makefile.in because of earlier errors


I've also tested automake 1.10 on the same machine and 1.9 on Gentoo and
FreeBSD without any success.

What's wrong?

Regards

Markus Wanner





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]