[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: branching for release?
From: |
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso |
Subject: |
Re: branching for release? |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Jan 2011 08:58:55 -0600 |
On 18 January 2011 04:25, John W. Eaton <address@hidden> wrote:
> If we were to release today with the current sources, are there any
> mind blowingly obvious problems that will affect nearly everyone who
> runs Octave?
I really wish we could fix the fltk race condition before release.
It's about the only problem before we can promote fltk as a reasonable
default. Not saying that it should be the default yet, only that I do
think this bug is serious enough.
- Jordi G. H.
- branching for release?, John W. Eaton, 2011/01/18
- Re: branching for release?,
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <=
- Re: branching for release?, Michael D Godfrey, 2011/01/18
- Re: branching for release?, logari81, 2011/01/19
- Re: branching for release?, Judd Storrs, 2011/01/19
- Re: branching for release?, John W. Eaton, 2011/01/19
- Re: branching for release?, Michael D Godfrey, 2011/01/19
- Re: branching for release?, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2011/01/19
- Re: branching for release?, Michael D Godfrey, 2011/01/19
- Re: branching for release?, Judd Storrs, 2011/01/19
- renaming "backend" (was: Re: branching for release?), John W. Eaton, 2011/01/20
- Re: FLTK changesets [was: branching for release?], Ben Abbott, 2011/01/20