octave-maintainers
[
Top
][
All Lists
]
Advanced
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
Re: branching for release?
From
:
Judd Storrs
Subject
:
Re: branching for release?
Date
:
Wed, 19 Jan 2011 23:32:03 -0500
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 5:44 PM, John W. Eaton
<
address@hidden
>
wrote:
We might eventually use gtk or qt in addition to fltk. Which one
would be "internal"?
In this case, I think the toolkit name works best for windows managed by octave ("fltk", "qt", "gtk", "windows", "macos", "motif", ... etc).
--judd
reply via email to
[
Prev in Thread
]
Current Thread
[
Next in Thread
]
branching for release?
,
John W. Eaton
,
2011/01/18
Re: branching for release?
,
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso
,
2011/01/18
Re: branching for release?
,
Michael D Godfrey
,
2011/01/18
Re: branching for release?
,
logari81
,
2011/01/19
Re: branching for release?
,
Judd Storrs
,
2011/01/19
Re: branching for release?
,
John W. Eaton
,
2011/01/19
Re: branching for release?
,
Michael D Godfrey
,
2011/01/19
Re: branching for release?
,
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso
,
2011/01/19
Re: branching for release?
,
Michael D Godfrey
,
2011/01/19
Re: branching for release?
,
Judd Storrs
<=
renaming "backend" (was: Re: branching for release?)
,
John W. Eaton
,
2011/01/20
Re: FLTK changesets [was: branching for release?]
,
Ben Abbott
,
2011/01/20
Re: FLTK changesets [was: branching for release?]
,
Ben Abbott
,
2011/01/20
Re: FLTK changesets [was: branching for release?]
,
logari81
,
2011/01/21
Re: FLTK changesets [was: branching for release?]
,
Ben Abbott
,
2011/01/21
Re: FLTK changesets [was: branching for release?]
,
Ben Abbott
,
2011/01/21
Re: FLTK changesets [was: branching for release?]
,
logari81
,
2011/01/22
Re: FLTK changesets [was: branching for release?]
,
logari81
,
2011/01/22
Re: FLTK changesets [was: branching for release?]
,
Ben Abbott
,
2011/01/22
Re: FLTK changesets [was: branching for release?]
,
Ben Abbott
,
2011/01/22
Prev by Date:
Re: branching for release?
Next by Date:
Array constructor backward compatibility problem
Previous by thread:
Re: branching for release?
Next by thread:
renaming "backend" (was: Re: branching for release?)
Index(es):
Date
Thread