Re: [Openexr-devel] Introduction and CTL/ICC question

[Kai-Uwe Behrmann]

Am 09.03.05, 12:26 -0800 schrieb Florian Kainz:

> We favor the procedural approach because it is extensible.
> Implementing new transformation algorithms should not
> require changing CTL.  This allows users to experiment
> with new algorithms.

Thats an big change, and as well an very interessting one.

> In addition, CTL programs can be parameterized; a single
> CTL program can represent a whole family of transforms.
> This is useful for image sequences where the value of a
> parameter may vary over time.  Parameterized transforms
> may also be useful for programs like image viewers where
> the user has control over settings like exposure or the
> amount of dynamic range compression.

Can this parameterized form be the base for ICC data exchange?

regards
Kai-Uwe Behrmann
                                + development for color management 
                                + imaging / panoramas
                                + email: address@hidden
                                + http://www.behrmann.name