-----Original Message-----
From:
address@hidden
[mailto:address@hidden
u.org] On Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 4:55 AM
To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [Simulavr-devel] avrtest and simulavr vs simulavrxx
avr-libc's testsuite mostly tests with AT90S8515 and ATmega128 targets
(which are present in simulavrxx), but some tests are run on a wider
list of target MCU types: AT90S2313, AT90S4414, AT90S8515, ATmega8,
ATmega16. These are not yet supported by simulavrxx. Further
unsupported targets include AT90S1200, ATmega32, ATmega103, and the
range of AT43USBxxx controllers. AT90S4414 is essentially the same as
AT90S8515, only less memory, so that should be easy. AT90S1200 is a
fairly different beast, and can probably be ignored as being long
obsolete.
Agreed: AT90S1200 is obsolete.
Likewise for ATmega103 (though that one *might* be
interesting in case full ATmega103 emulation of the ATmega128 is
desired).
I don't know of anyone using a mega103 these days. In the interest of time, I'd
rather drop that as obsolete.
AT43USBxxx are fairly specific, and certainly not really
worth the while.
Agreed. Many of those devices are replaced (sorta) by the AT90USB* /
ATmega???U? devices.
So ATmega8 (48/88 etc., too?), and ATmega16/32
(almost identical except for memory sizes) would remain as really
interesting additions.
Agreed.
Eric
_______________________________________________
Simulavr-devel mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/simulavr-devel