RE: [Simulavr-devel] avrtest and simulavr vs simulavrxx

[Weddington, Eric]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: 
> address@hidden 
> [mailto:address@hidden
> u.org] On Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch
> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 4:55 AM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [Simulavr-devel] avrtest and simulavr vs simulavrxx
> 
> avr-libc's testsuite mostly tests with AT90S8515 and ATmega128 targets
> (which are present in simulavrxx), but some tests are run on a wider
> list of target MCU types: AT90S2313, AT90S4414, AT90S8515, ATmega8,
> ATmega16.  These are not yet supported by simulavrxx.  Further
> unsupported targets include AT90S1200, ATmega32, ATmega103, and the
> range of AT43USBxxx controllers.  AT90S4414 is essentially the same as
> AT90S8515, only less memory, so that should be easy.  AT90S1200 is a
> fairly different beast, and can probably be ignored as being long
> obsolete.  

Agreed: AT90S1200 is obsolete.


> Likewise for ATmega103 (though that one *might* be
> interesting in case full ATmega103 emulation of the ATmega128 is
> desired).

I don't know of anyone using a mega103 these days. In the interest of time, I'd 
rather drop that as obsolete.

>  AT43USBxxx are fairly specific, and certainly not really
> worth the while.  

Agreed. Many of those devices are replaced (sorta) by the AT90USB* / 
ATmega???U? devices.

> So ATmega8 (48/88 etc., too?), and ATmega16/32
> (almost identical except for memory sizes) would remain as really
> interesting additions.

Agreed.

Eric