[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Ok, what about benchmarks
From: |
Darold Higa |
Subject: |
Ok, what about benchmarks |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Jan 2003 11:38:14 -0800 |
OK, with all of this being thrown around about the different environments and
languages, has anyone done an informal performance benchmark?
I ran my CasinoWorld simulation (the one from Luna and Perrone) using Swarm
1.4/Objective-C and got about 10x performance going from Windows 98 to Windows
NT/2000 and then another 10x Windows NT to Redhat (on roughly the same
hardware). This fact prompted my co-author Michael Harrington, to move from a
Win2k environment to Redhat.
The LinuxPPC implementation was slightly slower than Redhat. The only
subjective proof I have that there was rough hardware parity was that between
the mac running under MacOS9 and wintel hardware running under Win98, the mac
won running address@hidden (Probably not a good comparison, but the only cross
platform benchmark I had handy).
I didn't record the simulation times back then, I really should have.
I believe that the hardware used (if I recall correctly) was a G3 @ 300MHz, an
Athlon (SlotA) @600MHz. There might have been a PIII @ 700 somewhere in the
mix as well.
Darold Higa
Darold Higa
==================================
Swarm-Support is for discussion of the technical details of the day
to day usage of Swarm. For list administration needs (esp.
[un]subscribing), please send a message to <address@hidden>
with "help" in the body of the message.
Re: Multithreading question, Marcus G. Daniels, 2003/01/29
- Ok, what about benchmarks,
Darold Higa <=
- Re: Ok, what about benchmarks, Marcus G. Daniels, 2003/01/29
- RE: Ok, what about benchmarks, Darold Higa, 2003/01/29
- RE: Ok, what about benchmarks, gepr, 2003/01/29
- Re: Ok, what about benchmarks, Marcus G. Daniels, 2003/01/29
Optimization Ideas I collected: [Re: Ok, what about benchmarks, Paul E Johnson, 2003/01/29