[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Ok, what about benchmarks
From: |
gepr |
Subject: |
RE: Ok, what about benchmarks |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Jan 2003 13:13:22 -0800 |
Darold Higa writes:
> Sorry if it seems dumb, I only did this side by side comparison
> when the guy I was working with asked how long a simulation run
> took for me and I told him a few minutes and he said that it was
> taking him hours.
>
> Sorry for wasting everyone's time.
Ack!! It's not a waste of time at all! Thanks for starting
the thread. These issues always have to come up over and over
again in dialogue, in part because none of us are as diligent as
we should be in reading everything and in part because there are
lurkers out there who don't ask questions in public.
--
glen e. p. ropella =><= Hail Eris!
H: 831.335.4950 http://www.ropella.net/~gepr
M: 831.247.7901 http://www.tempusdictum.com
==================================
Swarm-Support is for discussion of the technical details of the day
to day usage of Swarm. For list administration needs (esp.
[un]subscribing), please send a message to <address@hidden>
with "help" in the body of the message.
Re: Multithreading question, Marcus G. Daniels, 2003/01/29
- Ok, what about benchmarks, Darold Higa, 2003/01/29
- Re: Ok, what about benchmarks, Marcus G. Daniels, 2003/01/29
- RE: Ok, what about benchmarks, Darold Higa, 2003/01/29
- RE: Ok, what about benchmarks,
gepr <=
- Re: Ok, what about benchmarks, Marcus G. Daniels, 2003/01/29
Optimization Ideas I collected: [Re: Ok, what about benchmarks, Paul E Johnson, 2003/01/29