gnash-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re[2]: [Gnash-dev] Backend redesign done / AGG near completion


From: Udo Giacomozzi
Subject: Re[2]: [Gnash-dev] Backend redesign done / AGG near completion
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 19:46:29 +0200

Hello Rob,

Thursday, October 5, 2006, 7:16:18 PM, you wrote:
RS>   Really, at 100Mhz. It's still encouraging that it works at all! :-)

It worked out of the box. We used GTK on the same CPU for other
(very simple!) projects and it was way too slow. It has only 100 MIPS,
but hey..


RS> There is an --enable-renderer=agg switch now.

Yes, I noticed it. However I can't compile Gnash anymore:

address@hidden:~/gnash$ make
make  all-recursive
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/indunet/gnash'
Making all in libbase
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/indunet/gnash/libbase'
if /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=compile g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. 
-I.. -I. -I.. -I../server     -I/usr/include/SDL      -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT  
-D_REENTRANT -I.. -I. -I.. -I../server     -I/usr/include/SDL     -g -O2 
-march=pentium3       -W       -Wall       -Wcast-align       -Wcast-qual       
-Wpointer-arith       -Wreturn-type        -MT container.lo -MD -MP -MF 
".deps/container.Tpo" -c -o container.lo container.cpp; \
then mv -f ".deps/container.Tpo" ".deps/container.Plo"; else rm -f 
".deps/container.Tpo"; exit 1; fi
 g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -I. -I.. -I../server -I/usr/include/SDL 
-DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT -D_REENTRANT -I.. -I. -I.. -I../server -I/usr/include/SDL 
-g -O2 -march=pentium3 -W -Wall -Wcast-align -Wcast-qual -Wpointer-arith 
-Wreturn-type -MT container.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/container.Tpo -c container.cpp 
 -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/container.o
container.cpp: In static member function `static int tu_string::stricmp(const
   char*, const char*)':
container.cpp:177: error: `_stricmp' undeclared (first use this function)
container.cpp:177: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once for
   each function it appears in.)

This does *not* seem related to the BOOST thread, correct?

I did automake and configure before calling make.

Any suggestions?
Udo





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]