[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Lzip-bug] [PATCH] lzip on Windows
From: |
Tino Lange |
Subject: |
Re: [Lzip-bug] [PATCH] lzip on Windows |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Oct 2009 10:03:19 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090817 Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 |
Hi JonY,
Great! Thanks for your work. The latest patch also worked fine on my side.
While you're in the mood :-) Do you think that you can port the lzlib
also to win32 / MinGW / MSYS ?
I guess this is quite similar and easy after having done lzip itself -
as as far as I know there's plenty of code duplication between lzip and
lzlib.
Thanks
Tino
--------------------------------------------
JonY schrieb:
> On 10/14/2009 00:35, Antonio Diaz Diaz wrote:
>> JonY wrote:
>>> I'll try to maintain and submit patches against future released
>>> versions to this list.
>>>
>>> In the mean time, you can point anybody wanting a native win32 build
>>> to the 2 attached patches via the mailing list archive.
>>
>> Thanks for the patches, but perhaps we could do something more useful
>> for windows users. Could you make a complete, patched source package and
>> a binary package of lzip-1.8? (Packages should be in the preferred
>> format for distributing windows software, I guess).
>>
>
> Hi,
>
> Zip files are plentiful enough that most Windows users should know how
> to deal with it.
>
> With many archive managers floating around (none of them know of lzip
> yet) on the Internet, tar.bz2 files are fine too, considering the
> audience of lzip.
>
>> If you make them and send them to my private address, I'll distribute
>> them along with the original source and will include a link from lzip's
>> home page giving you credit.
>>
>
> OK, sent.
>
>> Given that lzip is mature, only bug fixes and (small) performance
>> improvements are expected in future releases. So your packages can
>> remain useful for a long time.
>>
>
> Maintaining the Win32 port shouldn't be too hard I guess.
>
> Thanks.
- Re: [Lzip-bug] [PATCH] lzip on Windows, (continued)
- Re: [Lzip-bug] [PATCH] lzip on Windows, Antonio Diaz Diaz, 2009/10/11
- Re: [Lzip-bug] [PATCH] lzip on Windows, JonY, 2009/10/11
- Re: [Lzip-bug] [PATCH] lzip on Windows, Jon, 2009/10/12
- Re: [Lzip-bug] [PATCH] lzip on Windows, Antonio Diaz Diaz, 2009/10/12
- Re: [Lzip-bug] [PATCH] lzip on Windows, Tino Lange, 2009/10/12
- Re: [Lzip-bug] [PATCH] lzip on Windows, JonY, 2009/10/12
- Re: [Lzip-bug] [PATCH] lzip on Windows, Antonio Diaz Diaz, 2009/10/13
- Re: [Lzip-bug] [PATCH] lzip on Windows, JonY, 2009/10/13
- Re: [Lzip-bug] [PATCH] lzip on Windows, Antonio Diaz Diaz, 2009/10/13
- Re: [Lzip-bug] [PATCH] lzip on Windows, JonY, 2009/10/14
- Re: [Lzip-bug] [PATCH] lzip on Windows,
Tino Lange <=
- Re: [Lzip-bug] [PATCH] lzip on Windows, JonY, 2009/10/14
- Re: [Lzip-bug] [PATCH] lzip on Windows, Antonio Diaz Diaz, 2009/10/14
- Re: [Lzip-bug] [PATCH] lzip on Windows, JonY, 2009/10/14
- Re: [Lzip-bug] [PATCH] lzip on Windows, Antonio Diaz Diaz, 2009/10/14
- Re: [Lzip-bug] [PATCH] lzip on Windows, Tino Lange, 2009/10/14
- Re: [Lzip-bug] [PATCH] lzip on Windows, Antonio Diaz Diaz, 2009/10/15
- Re: [Lzip-bug] [PATCH] lzip on Windows, JonY, 2009/10/13