[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cameleon-dev] Findlib and beyond...
From: |
Alan Schmitt |
Subject: |
Re: [cameleon-dev] Findlib and beyond... |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Jul 2003 10:38:21 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
* Jérôme Marant (address@hidden) wrote:
> Quoting Alan Schmitt <address@hidden>:
>
> > * Jérôme Marant (address@hidden) wrote:
> > > Quoting Sylvain LE GALL <address@hidden>:
> > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > Since 4 days, i am working on a new master.Makefile.in and the
> > > > adaptation of cameleon to findlib...
> > >
> > > Please don't. Findlib sucks so much. Having to create META files
> > > is just stupid ...
> >
> > I must say that I find myself convinced by this compelling argument.
>
> Ah! I knew it didn't need any further explaination! It is self-explainatory,
> isn't it?
>
> > Just kidding, of course. Findlib rulez ;-)
>
> I'm not convinced by this compelling argument :-)
>
;-)
> It don't like the format of META files, and this is why I've never
> found myself willing to make effort to look further ...
Findlib is one proposal to make library management easier. It has one
huge advantage: it is implemented, and a few libraries use it (we use it
a lot here at Penn for unison / xtatic / harmony development). It is
also a library, so if you want more information to be supportd in META
files, you can write a tool that supports it.
I'd be definitely willing to test (and maybe use) other tools, but I do
not know of any. It might not be perfect, but for me it's definitely
better than nothing.
Alan
--
The hacker: someone who figured things out and made something cool happen.
Re: [cameleon-dev] Findlib and beyond..., Sylvain LE GALL, 2003/07/28