Re: line-move-visual never set to nil?

[David Reitter]

On 30 Jul 2008, at 01:31, Miles Bader wrote:

> David Reitter <address@hidden> writes:
> > How about new functions for the visual movement, and binding the  
> > arrow
> > keys to that?  There could be a mode to bind the keys, and this mode
> > could default to on.
>
> No.
>
> The arrow keys should _not_ be "special".

I've been misunderstood.  I also meant to bind C-n/C-p to the new  
functions.

But if keyboard macros don't record the invoked functions, but key  
presses, then that won't help of course.
This is only about backwards compatibility!

If a user records a new macro using movement keys, then they should  
get the new behavior, of course...

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature