emacs-wiki-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [emacs-wiki-discuss] Some bugs and feature requests


From: Gary V . Vaughan
Subject: Re: [emacs-wiki-discuss] Some bugs and feature requests
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 21:58:01 +0100

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Jody!

On 20 Apr 2004, at 21:01, Jody Klymak wrote:
"Gary V. Vaughan" <address@hidden> writes:
My journal mode has one wiki page per Category (topic), and puts
cross- reference links in each category page pointing back at the
new entry.

Hmmm, which is what remember-planner does.  So I'm not sure what the
OP was after that is different.

I was referring to auto-completion. The only other significant differences are the slashdot style category icons, and the nice reverse chronological all-on-one-page layout. But I think OP was referring to auto-completion.

My journal page never grew large enough to get me to write any pruning
functions, but they would be needed by anyone who used the mode in anger :-)

Your subdirectory organization is intriguing.  I think Sacha was
thinking of incorporating that for planner.  Maybe that goes a long
way towards what the OP was after?  However, having to type in
computers/programming/emacs/emacs-wiki is a little more tiresome than
typing EmacsWiki.

As the patch stands, and for the sake of my publishing to a Blosxom story heirarchy, you do have to type the whole thing. And it is a bit of a pain...

  Or do your scripts simply expand EmacsWiki
according to where that page is on publishing?

In an earlier thread we did start to discuss whether it was desirable to
enforce unique naming across all of the files in a project... that would be
a sufficient condition to write a function to keep an alist of
'( pagename . location ), and diagnose duplicates etc.

Now that I think about it again, there is no need to allow planner to have duplicate names for day pages in a 2004/04/20 style heirarchy; I can enforce unique naming, and planner could use 2004/04/2004.04.20. That would make the buffer name in the modeline more informative too... and you still get a tidier
index :-)

Cheers,
        Gary.
- --
Gary V. Vaughan      ())_.  address@hidden,gnu.org}
Research Scientist   ( '/   http://tkd.kicks-ass.net
GNU Hacker           / )=   http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool
Technical Author   `(_~)_   http://sources.redhat.com/autobook

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFAhY7cFRMICSmD1gYRAiWjAKC8EhgVJIOWX9Dy0e/uCvImKzepIACgvfZq
KLXmRn5qvyI3aOUATLSsoJo=
=U8IV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]