Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tree has no patch log for version

[Dustin Sallings]

On Saturday, Sep 13, 2003, at 09:37 US/Pacific, Robert Anderson wrote:

> Sounds like you probably made two mistakes, both which would have been
> trapped if you were using a more recent tla:
>
> 1) you committed to a mirror.  You can't do that, and tla shouldn't let
> you.  What version are you using?

        It didn't, I was wrong.  dists--release-tla--1.1--patch-5

> 2) you probably used an alias of an archive name in a "tla get" 
> command,
> which set the tree-version to the alias, which causes those "no patch
> log for version" errors.  tla shouldn't let you do that, either, and
> current versions don't, I think.

	Yes, that was correct.  It did let me check it out, and got the 
correct tree (I could build and stuff), but gave me the patch errors.

--
SPY                      My girlfriend asked me which one I like better.
pub  1024/3CAE01D5 1994/11/03 Dustin Sallings <address@hidden>
|    Key fingerprint =  87 02 57 08 02 D0 DA D6  C8 0F 3E 65 51 98 D8 BE
L_______________________ I hope the answer won't upset her. ____________