Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: give us a hand with arch

[Andrea Arcangeli]

On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 10:51:28PM -0700, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Sep 2003, Miles Bader wrote:
> 
> > Davide Libenzi <address@hidden> writes:
> > > > > Personally I do see some of Andrea points. I'm using explicit tagging
> > > > > because, like Andrea, I do want to commit strictly.
> > > >
> > > > What is the source of this canard?  What does "strict commits" have to
> > > > do with explicit tagging?  Please explain your thought process.
> > >
> > > I do fairly often use-and-trash C (or Perl or whatever) test source
> > > files that are used to test something and that I do not want to be
> > > included in my commits.
> >
> > ... so use `tagline; untagged-source junk'
> >
> > result: files random are not committed unless you explicit tag them (via
> > `tila add' or by adding a tagline).
> 
> I know, but what's the point of having tagline for me ? I will never use
> the tag-line: inside my sources and I will always require an add-tag with
> my usage pattern. Look, I'm not saying to nuke tagline. I'm just saying
> that tagline+tricks == explicit for me.

agreed.

Andrea - If you prefer relying on open source software, check these links:
            rsync.kernel.org::pub/scm/linux/kernel/bkcvs/linux-2.[45]/
            http://www.cobite.com/cvsps/