Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch performance with large trees

[Catalin Marinas]

Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:
> Hmmm.... Looking at that file, there seem to be enough hints in the
> header comment to accurately guess rename info without looking at
> bkbits:
>
> Truly deleted files look like this:
>
>    # BitKeeper/deleted/.del-rte_ma1_cb-ksram.ld~f045845fc65842ff
>    #   2002/12/20 22:18:52-08:00 address@hidden +0 -0
>    #   Delete: arch/v850/rte_ma1_cb-ksram.ld
>    #

Still one more problem: the BKCVS log seems to only contain the first
part of the message. It does not include any of the file
descriptions. Anyway, this information ca probably be accessible
through the bk-commits mailing list. One would just need to store the
received patches in a search-able manner (the simple script would get
a bit more complicated though).

Catalin