gnu-arch-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Linux BKCVS to GNU Arch Script


From: Paul Mundt
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Linux BKCVS to GNU Arch Script
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 12:01:45 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6i

On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 09:02:32AM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> Paul Mundt <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Seems to break with current BK, though I have not looked in to it
> > yet:
> 
> Oh, I hope that's a false alarm, I based my repositories on this
> script :-(
> 
Indeed, this is what I have been moving to as well, so I hope it is just
a usage error on my part.

> First of all, the 1.26 consistent.c revision that fails in your case
> corresponds to the global BKCVS revision 1.26831 (ChangeSet,v) - after
> Linux 2.6.11-rc5. The "+ off" change was added to consistent.c in the
> local revision 1.25 which corresponds to the global revision 1.26789 -
> after 2.6.11-rc4.
> 
Ok, I do have the 1.26789 rev, but not 1.26831 (this is the one that
caused the reject, ,bkcvs-last-rev is currently 1.26830).

Lets see if 1.26789 lines up with what is in BK.. it's going to take
awhile to build up to these patch levels in my revlib, so I will keep you
posted once this finishes up.

> Can you show me the first kernel version when you started tracking
> BKCVS, the initial ChangeSet,v revision you put in ,bkcvs-last-rev and
> a "cat-log" of "base-0" in your repository?
> 
I started tracking at 2.6.10 (I figured I would start out with the
example you provided to make sure nothing out of the ordinary happened,
prior to trying to go back any further). So the ,bkcvs-last-rev I had
when starting out was 1.24782.

The base-0 log is a bit long, so instead of wasting everyone elses
bandwidth, I'll send this to you privately.

Attachment: pgpe21NE23zms.pgp
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]