gnu-arch-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hmm. an alternative to a new maintainer. Hire y


From: Andrew Suffield
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hmm. an alternative to a new maintainer. Hire your manager.
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 21:23:11 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.11

On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 01:07:39PM +0200, Karel Gardas wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Oct 2005, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> 
> >I haven't seen such a ridiculous comparison since the last time
> >somebody was playing partisan power games about revision control
> >systems. It was clearly deliberately engineered to be as favourable as
> >possible to one - pure political noise. This is exactly the sort of
> >crap I was talking about earlier.
> 
> Andrew, do you agree that tla UI is kind of complex especially in 
> comparison with other alternatives?

No, all the other alternatives are pretty much the same, except when
they're being deliberately biased by the person reporting them -
typically by comparing the most complicated form of one to the
simplest form of another.

-- 
  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
 : :' :  http://www.debian.org/ |
 `. `'                          |
   `-             -><-          |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]