[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Association] true-democratic association & the Ethics Officer's vet
|
From: |
Davi Leal |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Association] true-democratic association & the Ethics Officer's veto power |
|
Date: |
Sat, 20 Jan 2007 10:36:30 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.5 |
Davi Leal wrote:
> With the current charter draft proposal, should we remove the 'true' part
> from the "true-democratic" sentence to avoid confusion?.
I do not think so.
I think the association, as defined in the current Charter, is
true-democratic, due to the Ethics Officer's veto power is to:
* keep the Free Software identity, not to remove autonomy.
* avoid evolving in a wrong way.
Just my personal opinion,
Davi
- Re: GNU Herds -- Content Management Systems (CMS), Davi Leal, 2007/01/18
- Re: true-democratic association & the Ethics Officer's veto power, Davi Leal, 2007/01/18
- Re: [Association] true-democratic association & the Ethics Officer's veto power,
Davi Leal <=
- Re: true-democratic association & the Ethics Officer's veto power, MJ Ray, 2007/01/25
- Re: true-democratic association & the Ethics Officer's veto power, Davi Leal, 2007/01/28
- Contact with RMS to remove the veto power, Davi Leal, 2007/01/31
- Re: Contact with RMS to remove the veto power, Antenore Gatta, 2007/01/31
- Re: Contact with RMS to remove the veto power, Davi Leal, 2007/01/31
- Re: Contact with RMS to remove the veto power, Antenore Gatta, 2007/01/31
Re: GNU Herds -- Content Management Systems (CMS), Davi Leal, 2007/01/21