Re: Making guile-gtk-1.2 stable?

[Marius Vollmer]

Kevin Ryde <address@hidden> writes:

> Marius Vollmer <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>> I would say that is the plan.  we _do_ have support for Glade, GtkGL,
>
> I'd wondered if GtkGL as it stands was usable for anything.  It didn't
> look like any GL drawing primitives were wrapped, only the widget
> stuff.
>
>> So, what about "guile-gnome"
>
> If the module names are "(gnome foo)" then guile-gnome makes sense.
>
> The only thing against "gnome" in the name is that not everyone is a
> big fan of gnome and might be wanting to use only gtk, which such a
> name doesn't suggest.

Also, the 'wrapper project' is named "guile-gtk", not "guile-gnome".
It might be confusing if you had to look at
www.gnu.org/software/guile-gtk for things related to the guile-gnome
package.

>> or "guile-gnome-2"?
>
> I wouldn't put the version number in there.  Plan to basically keep up
> with whatever the current gnome+gtk is.  As long as there's no big
> incompatible changes that shouldn't be burdensome.

Agreed.