Re: [Help-gnunet] help with database management

[Christian Grothoff]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sunday 12 October 2003 04:23 pm, you wrote:
> > Hmm. You do not happen to have an option
> > INDEX-CONTENT = YES
> > in your gnunet.conf by any chance? Then gnunet-insert would always insert
> > and not index.  Given a quota of 5 GB (minus 700 MB) would result in
> > about 4.2 GB left (afs storage left), so it would match pretty nicely.
>
> The phrase "INDEX-CONTENT" does not appear in gnunet.conf. Recall that I
> have ACTIVEMIGRATION enabled, so some of the afs storage may be being used
> by migrated content. However with Igor Wronsky's help I have pretty
> determined that the DB is a-ok, so the only plausible explanation left is
> that the content was inserted rather than indexed. I am quite certain that
> I did not insert the content (unless gnunet-gtk is inserting content marked
> "index only") - is there anything else that would cause the content to be
> inserted?

Only either a switch given to gnunet-gtk or gnunet-insert.  Hmm. I get the
same problem whenever I insert (or index) files with gnunet-gtk.  I suspect
the selection index/insert in gnunet-gtk is broken.  If you were using
gnunet-gtk (and not gnunet-insert) for the files, that would explain the
problem.  I'll look at the code later tonight and make sure it is fixed in
CVS.  Thanks for reporting!

> > I've added an entry to the FAQ for this one
> > (http://www.ovmj.org/GNUnet/faq.php3#tell
>
> Thanks for the tip - wish I had seen that earlier!

You could not.  I just added it in response to your E-mail. :-)

Christian
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/icaz9tNtMeXQLkIRAirGAJ45CgIPKkQthYkzFY8HvV5hltMSCQCcDRHi
H7a5qB00B0PN9zqTfNq7IxE=
=f3CO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----