Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Fwd: The FSF Allows No Derivatives,

[Aaron Wolf]

The relevant question isn't "does anyone misrepresent RMS", the question
is "are there examples of misrepresentation that violate the CC-BY-ND
license and would not be violations of CC-BY-SA" because those are the
only sort that the ND license discussion is relevant to.

I could look through your references, but since you looked at them
already, you'd be faster at identifying answers to whether any fit this
question.

On 05/22/2015 11:27 PM, Will Hill wrote:
> You might remember the "RMS is a sexist" fiasco, where all sorts of articles 
> poured out misrepresenting the Virgin of Emacs as the thing it parodies.  
> That's a minor but nasty example.  Software owners are constantly staging 
> these things while their advertising and other messages are completely 
> degraded.  
> 
> This is a systematic thing and your question has encouraged me to finish up a 
> few essays I've been working on.  Some suggested reading includes,
> 
> http://www.groklaw.net/articlebasic.php?story=20071023002351958
> http://techrights.org/2009/02/08/microsoft-evilness-galore/
> http://techrights.org/2008/12/27/microsoft-shills-aka-te-secrets/
> http://www.catb.org/esr/halloween/halloween1.html
> http://archive09.linux.com/articles/38081
> http://www.groklaw.net/articlebasic.php?story=20100312150121798
> http://techrights.org/2009/03/16/smear-campaigns-against-foss-proponents/
> http://techrights.org/2008/03/17/manufacturing-abuse/
> http://blog.wired.com/business/2007/03/enough_about_me.html
> http://techrights.org/2009/05/02/perception-management-at-microsoft/
> http://www.cypherpunks.to/~peter/zdnet.html
> 
> 
> 
> On Friday 22 May 2015, streondj@gmail.com wrote:
>> will hill" easy to observe pattern of publishers missrepresenting GNU
>> and the FSF by all means at their disposal"
>>
>> examples?
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Aaron Wolf
co-founder, Snowdrift.coop
music teacher, wolftune.com