[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: improving the CG
From: |
Mark Polesky |
Subject: |
Re: improving the CG |
Date: |
Sun, 27 Dec 2009 06:36:23 -0800 (PST) |
Trevor Daniels wrote:
> I see you still have the Windows section separate.
> Is it not feasible to integrate it? It's only
> separate because the early contributions were made
> independently.
It is feasible to integrate it, but this is a potentially
big task that I'm undertaking and I need to see the big
picture before I make too many specific decisions. I
agree that the integration of that particular section
isn't yet right, but it's still a work in progress.
Thanks for you helping me with this!
- Mark
- Re: improving the CG, (continued)
- Re: improving the CG, John Mandereau, 2009/12/27
- Re: improving the CG, Carl Sorensen, 2009/12/27
- Re: improving the CG, John Mandereau, 2009/12/27
- Re: improving the CG, Carl Sorensen, 2009/12/28
- Re: improving the CG, Trevor Daniels, 2009/12/28
- Re: improving the CG, Colin Campbell, 2009/12/28
- Re: improving the CG, Graham Percival, 2009/12/28
- Re: improving the CG, Colin Campbell, 2009/12/28
- Re: improving the CG, Graham Percival, 2009/12/28
Re: improving the CG, Trevor Daniels, 2009/12/27
- Re: improving the CG,
Mark Polesky <=
Re: improving the CG, Graham Percival, 2009/12/27
- Re: improving the CG, Mark Polesky, 2009/12/28
- Re: improving the CG, Carl Sorensen, 2009/12/28
- Re: improving the CG, Colin Campbell, 2009/12/28
- Re: improving the CG, Graham Percival, 2009/12/28
- Re: improving the CG, John Mandereau, 2009/12/28
- Re: improving the CG, Graham Percival, 2009/12/28
- Re: improving the CG, Colin Campbell, 2009/12/28
- Re: improving the CG, Graham Percival, 2009/12/28
Re: improving the CG, Graham Percival, 2009/12/28