Re: NR 2.1 Vocal music

[Trevor Daniels]

Graham Percival wrote Thursday, August 12, 2010 7:38 PM
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 07:07:45PM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> > However, I realise 2.14 might happen any time real soon
> > now, so I'd make sure any changes I pushed were complete
> > and an improvement over what was there before, so that
> > 2.14 could be released at any time without 2.1 looking
> > a mess.
>
> I'd really rather that you helped out with programming (or at
> least testing+reviewing patches) and critical doc issues... 

I looked through the 12 remaining critical issues before making
my suggestion to tackle NR 2.1.  8 are marked as started, of
which 2 have patches being reworked by the authors.

Of the 4 remaining, 2 are website stuff that only you can do,
1 Carl has promised to look at and the final one I think only
Joe can tackle.

I can't do any programming as I know from experience that
requires long sessions at the keyboard.
 
> On the other hand, it's been so long already, so there's no real
> harm in adding a few more weeks.  I'm not sensing much urgency
> from people, so you might as well start a new large task.

As I said, if the present state of NR 2.1 is acceptable for 2.14
then any change I push will also be acceptable, as it will be
an improvement.  So there's no need to hold up 2.14 on this
score.

> So really, it's up to you.

OK; I'll make a start.

Trevor