[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Suggestion for Notation Reference
From: |
Mats Bengtsson |
Subject: |
Re: Suggestion for Notation Reference |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Jan 2009 22:53:50 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105) |
Jonathan Kulp wrote:
I don't know. This is definitely a strange example. The \mark
command is meant to insert something over a barline, so maybe it'd be
best to delete this example altogether and reword things a bit so that
the example with "colla parte" is the only one illustrating this feature.
Agreed! It's very rare to insert textual indications between
the notes within a measure (where, on the other hand, it's
not uncommon to attach textual indications to a specific
note, i.e. using a text script). You might want to replace
"colla parte" with "Coda", but again it's very hard to illustrate
the usefulness of using \mark for textual indications if you're
not allowed to change the alignment to #LEFT or #RIGHT.
I'm not convinced that it's less confusing to avoid the use of
\override and instead provide more or less irrelevant examples
of useful features.
/Mats
- Suggestion for Notation Reference, Lasse Rempe, 2009/01/18
- Re: Suggestion for Notation Reference, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/01/18
- Re: Suggestion for Notation Reference, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2009/01/18
- Re: Suggestion for Notation Reference, Graham Percival, 2009/01/19
- Re: Suggestion for Notation Reference, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/01/19
- Re: Suggestion for Notation Reference, Lasse Rempe, 2009/01/19
- Re: Suggestion for Notation Reference, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/01/19
- Re: Suggestion for Notation Reference,
Mats Bengtsson <=
- Re: Suggestion for Notation Reference, Graham Percival, 2009/01/20
- Re: Suggestion for Notation Reference, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/01/20
- Re: Suggestion for Notation Reference, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/01/20