|
From: | Urs Liska |
Subject: | Re: musicxml2ly enhancements |
Date: | Tue, 09 Apr 2013 13:25:34 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130329 Thunderbird/17.0.5 |
Am 09.04.2013 13:19, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
I have come to the conclusion that it is a _very_ good idea to make a measure number for _every_ measure.2013/4/9 Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden>:Putting the bar number at the start of the line would require %{ 5 %} a,4 ( a4 ) ( b4 ) d4 | instead.I like that. It's tedious to type manually, but a computer program doesn't know that word :-)Indeed, but i find it unreadable, especially if it was placed at every line. I think that the best way to mark bar numbers in source is to make a separate-line comment every 5 or so measures:\clef "treble" \key c \major \numericTimeSignature \time 4/4 a4 ( a4) ( b4 ) d4 | \key c \major a4 ( a4 ) ( b4 ) d4 | a4 ( a4 ) ( b4 ) d4 | g1 | % m.5 a,4 ( a4 ) ( b4 ) d4 | g1 | a,4 ( a4 ) ( b4 ) d4 | g1 | a,4 ( a4 ) ( b4 ) d4 | % m.10 g1 | a,4 ( a4 ) ( b4 ) d4 |etc. Janek
That way you have a measure indicator in each Git diff.Which proves useful to map the change to the location in the file if the line numbers have changed considerably in the meantime.
Urs
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list address@hidden https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |