[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1
From: |
David Levine |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1 |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Jul 2014 22:10:26 -0400 |
Jerry wrote:
> address@hidden nmh]$ flex -V
> flex 2.5.37
Would you email me your entire dtimep.c, please? There's a
fixup for this issue in configure.ac for 2.5.36. But not for
2.5.37 because that's what I use (on Fedora 20) and it looked
like that fixed the problem.
And maybe look in build_nmh.log to verify that it used just
"flex", rather than specifying the full path to some other one.
I wouldn't expect that to happen, though.
David
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, Bill Wohler, 2014/07/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, heymanj, 2014/07/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2014/07/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, heymanj, 2014/07/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2014/07/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, Jerry Heyman, 2014/07/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, Ken Hornstein, 2014/07/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, Bill Wohler, 2014/07/22
Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, David Levine, 2014/07/22
Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, David Levine, 2014/07/22
Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1,
David Levine <=
Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, David Levine, 2014/07/22
Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, David Levine, 2014/07/23