[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1
From: |
David Levine |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1 |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Jul 2014 22:48:53 -0400 |
Jerry wrote:
> Attached both the generated file (sbr/dtimep.c) and the build_nmh.log.
$ diff dtimep.c sbr
2360c2360
< int i;
---
> yy_size_t i;
where dtimep.c is yours. How strange. I wonder if a patch
by the distro, another common Linux gotcha, introduced the
regression?
Given that this is harmless and appears to have been fixed
by the flex developers about two years ago, I'm content to
ignore it.
David
Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, David Levine, 2014/07/22
Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, David Levine, 2014/07/22
Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, David Levine, 2014/07/22
Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1,
David Levine <=
Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, David Levine, 2014/07/23