[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1
From: |
David Levine |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1 |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Jul 2014 07:57:25 -0400 |
I wrote:
> $ diff dtimep.c sbr
> 2360c2360
> < int i;
> ---
> > yy_size_t i;
>
> where dtimep.c is yours. How strange. I wonder if a patch
> by the distro, another common Linux gotcha, introduced the
> regression?
Right track, wrong direction. Fedora patches flex 2.5.37 to fix
this. So the problem was still in unpatched 2.5.37. It was
fixed by 2.5.39.
David
Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, David Levine, 2014/07/22
Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, David Levine, 2014/07/22
Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, David Levine, 2014/07/22
Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, David Levine, 2014/07/22
Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1,
David Levine <=