[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1
From: |
Lyndon Nerenberg |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1 |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Jul 2014 17:35:41 -0700 |
On Jul 22, 2014, at 5:21 PM, address@hidden wrote:
> Further unwinding of the problem is that on my amd64 (Mageia 3) system,
> size_t winds up being resolved as an 'unsigned long int' in the gcc 4.7.2
> headers (/path/to/gcc/4.7.2/include/stddef.h). The line in question is:
>
>> for ( i = 0; i < _yybytes_len; ++i )
>
> where 'i' is an int, and _yybytes_len is size_t. Since timep.c is generated
> by flex, so changing the _yy* variables isn't an easy out. We could add
>
> #define YY_TYPEDEF_YY_SIZE_T
> typedef long int yy_size_t
size_t is required to be an unsigned type, so this would just mask the problem.
What version of flex are you using? And what's your OS version/patch-level?
--lyndon
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, Bill Wohler, 2014/07/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, Ken Hornstein, 2014/07/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, Bill Wohler, 2014/07/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2014/07/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2014/07/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, Ken Hornstein, 2014/07/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, Ken Hornstein, 2014/07/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, Jerry Heyman, 2014/07/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, Bill Wohler, 2014/07/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, heymanj, 2014/07/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1,
Lyndon Nerenberg <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, heymanj, 2014/07/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2014/07/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, Jerry Heyman, 2014/07/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, Ken Hornstein, 2014/07/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, Bill Wohler, 2014/07/22
Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, David Levine, 2014/07/22
Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, David Levine, 2014/07/22
Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, David Levine, 2014/07/22
Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, David Levine, 2014/07/22