[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1
From: |
Jerry Heyman |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1 |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Jul 2014 22:23:02 -0400 |
On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 22:10:26 -0400, David Levine <address@hidden> wrote:
> Jerry wrote:
>
> > address@hidden nmh]$ flex -V
> > flex 2.5.37
>
> Would you email me your entire dtimep.c, please? There's a
> fixup for this issue in configure.ac for 2.5.36. But not for
> 2.5.37 because that's what I use (on Fedora 20) and it looked
> like that fixed the problem.
Understood. Linux is a moving target, and at times can be painful
to make sure things are ported successfully. I do this for a living
on the commercial side, so which Linux distros we support is limited
for just this reason.
> And maybe look in build_nmh.log to verify that it used just
> "flex", rather than specifying the full path to some other one.
> I wouldn't expect that to happen, though.
Attached both the generated file (sbr/dtimep.c) and the build_nmh.log.
I see configure identify flex, but the invocation appears not to be
as easily discerned. I see -- flex
This is the first time I've pulled from source, I usually just download
the .tgz when ya'll announce a new release.
>
> David
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nmh-workers mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
jerry
--
// Jerry Heyman | We are all born ignorant, but
// Amigan Forever :-) | one must work hard to remain stupid
\\ // heymanj at acm dot org | -- Benjamin Franklin
\X/ http://www.hobbeshollow.com|
build_nmh.log
Description: Text document
dtimep.c
Description: Text Data
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, heymanj, 2014/07/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2014/07/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, heymanj, 2014/07/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2014/07/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, Jerry Heyman, 2014/07/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, Ken Hornstein, 2014/07/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, Bill Wohler, 2014/07/22
Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, David Levine, 2014/07/22
Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, David Levine, 2014/07/22
Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, David Levine, 2014/07/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1,
Jerry Heyman <=
Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, David Levine, 2014/07/22
Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, David Levine, 2014/07/23