[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lists] Re: [Pan-users] Difficulty In Compiling 0.99
From: |
Darren Albers |
Subject: |
Re: [lists] Re: [Pan-users] Difficulty In Compiling 0.99 |
Date: |
Sun, 28 May 2006 19:03:25 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060522) |
I think the package you want is libgmime2.1-dev. Alternately if my
packages have been working for you the package for .99 is available at
http://darrenalbers.com/Pan/ To make it easier for Charles I am going
to start hosting my packages myself so he can just link them. Generally
I upload the latest package early on Sundays.
If it does work please let me know so I can note that for other Mepis users.
Thanks,
Darren
Graham wrote:
> On Sun, 28 May 2006 14:21:38 -0700
> walt <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>
>> Graham wrote:
>>
>>> I'm running Mepis and therefore I usually get my updates through
>>> apt-get.
>>>
>> Heh. The reason I switched to gentoo is that the debian packaging
>> system simply defeats me. Recently I tried installing ubuntoo
>> (also based on the debian/apt-get system) and I still can't figure
>> out how to install what I need :o(
>>
>
> Well, that's interesting because no matter how I try, I can't get my
> head around Gentoo :o)
>
> Ubuntu uses its own repositories and often Debian packages not compiled
> for Ubuntu will not run properly under Ubuntu and vice-versa....
> Anyway, I digress!
>
> The output I get from your suggestion is:
>
> address@hidden pkg-config --modversion gmime 2.1.14
> Package gmime was not found in the pkg-config search path.
> Perhaps you should add the directory containing `gmime.pc'
> to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
> No package 'gmime' found
> Package 2.1.14 was not found in the pkg-config search path.
> Perhaps you should add the directory containing `2.1.14.pc'
> to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
> No package '2.1.14' found
>
> [snipped]
>
>> You can see that I have gmime version 2.1.14 installed on my
>> machine. If you don't routinely compile software, you may not
>> even have the required 'development' packages installed on your
>> machine. Difficult to say without more info from you about your
>> setup and your level of experience with building software.
>>
>
> I don't regularly compile binaries from source, but its not unknown.
>
> As you can see, gmime-2.1 is not on my system, nor the version you
> have. However, the Debian repositories come up zero when trying to
> find gmime-2.1, its not in any of the repositories in my sources.list,
> and googling comes up zero.
>
> Pan 0.98 installs well from the .deb. The last version of Pan I
> compiled from source was 0.91, and it compiled OK. So unless I can get
> gmime-2.1.0 from somewhere, I can't compile Pan 0.99
>
>
- [Pan-users] Difficulty In Compiling 0.99, Graham, 2006/05/28
- Re: [Pan-users] Difficulty In Compiling 0.99, walt, 2006/05/28
- Re: [lists] Re: [Pan-users] Difficulty In Compiling 0.99, Graham, 2006/05/28
- Re: [lists] Re: [Pan-users] Difficulty In Compiling 0.99,
Darren Albers <=
- Re: [lists] Re: [Pan-users] Difficulty In Compiling 0.99, Graham, 2006/05/29
- Re: [lists] Re: [Pan-users] Difficulty In Compiling 0.99, walt, 2006/05/29
- Re: [lists] Re: [Pan-users] Difficulty In Compiling 0.99, Charles Kerr, 2006/05/29
- Re: [lists] Re: [Pan-users] Difficulty In Compiling 0.99, Graham, 2006/05/29
- Re: [lists] Re: [Pan-users] Difficulty In Compiling 0.99, walt, 2006/05/29
- [Pan-users] Re: [lists] Re: Difficulty In Compiling 0.99, Duncan, 2006/05/29
- Re: [lists] Re: [Pan-users] Difficulty In Compiling 0.99, Darren Albers, 2006/05/29
- Re: [lists] Re: [Pan-users] Difficulty In Compiling 0.99, Graham, 2006/05/29
- Re: [lists] Re: [Pan-users] Difficulty In Compiling 0.99, walt, 2006/05/28