Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: The QEMU Accelerator Module

[Hetz Ben Hamo]

Hmm,

I don't mind hosting the kqemu module, whether as a CVS or as
snapshots (or both) ....

Thanks,
Hetz


On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 16:23:53 +1300, Darryl Dixon
<address@hidden> wrote:
>  Please Johannes,
>  
>     No-one has suggested that Fabrice should work for nothing; that was not
> a fair comment at all.  Many people on this list (myself included) have in
> fact offered finance to see the accelerator module GPL'ed (if that is
> possible).  The question Anand asked is eminently reasonable and for
> perfectly practical reasons it needs to be resolved one way or the other
> (e.g. if the accel module must be hosted elsewhere, would it be best to move
> the whole project so everything stays in one place?).  An equally unfair
> counter-question would be 'is it fair to use freely provided hosting that
> cost other people real money and break their TOS?'
>  
>      I for one am happy to see the existence of this module in any form at
> all, but that doesn't mean that certain practical matters can be ignored. 
> In fact, the Wine project just recently grappled with the same issue with
> (IIRC) Microsoft's DCOM redistributable and their sourceforge hosting.  In
> the end they now host it elsewhere.  Perhaps Fabrice could get an exception
> from the Savannah team if they are asked?
>  
>  Many regards,
>  Darryl Dixon
> 
>  
>  On Sat, 2005-02-12 at 03:01 +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote: 
>  Hi, On Sat, 12 Feb 2005, Anand Kumria wrote: > Is it really fair to
> distribute a proprietary module from a free software > source code
> repository? Is it really fair to expect others to work for nothing at all?
> Hth, Dscho _______________________________________________ Qemu-devel
> mailing list address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel 
>  -- 
>  Darryl Dixon <address@hidden> 
> _______________________________________________
> Qemu-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
> 
> 
>